linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: gpiolib: Add ngirq member to struct gpio_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 14 May 2022 00:12:48 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: gpiolib: Add ngirq member to struct gpio_irq_chip

On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 7:10 AM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:

> Supported GPIO IRQs by the chip is not always equal to the number of GPIO
> pins. For example on Renesas RZ/G2L SoC where it has GPIO0-122 pins but at
> a give point a maximum of only 32 GPIO pins can be used as IRQ lines in
> the IRQC domain.
>
> This patch adds ngirq member to struct gpio_irq_chip and passes this as a
> size to irq_domain_create_hierarchy()/irq_domain_create_simple() if it is
> being set in the driver otherwise fallbacks to using ngpio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>

As mentioned in some other patch, try to use .valid_mask for this instead.

Yours,
Linus Walleij