[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220513085108.3567310-1-davidgow@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:51:08 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kunit: tool: Use qemu-system-i386 for i386 runs
We're currently using the x86_64 qemu for i386 builds. While this is not
incorrect, it's probably more sensible to use the i386 one, which will
at least fail properly if we accidentally were to build a 64-bit kernel.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py
index 52b80be40e4b..4463ebefd567 100644
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/i386.py
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ QEMU_ARCH = QemuArchParams(linux_arch='i386',
kconfig='''
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y''',
- qemu_arch='x86_64',
+ qemu_arch='i386',
kernel_path='arch/x86/boot/bzImage',
kernel_command_line='console=ttyS0',
extra_qemu_params=[])
--
2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists