[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxpZBd_ViGvWQxmhnThQ1YBb3k1DhmkHcmENzW9SY9hS4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:56:12 -0700
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: tool: Use qemu-system-i386 for i386 runs
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 1:51 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> We're currently using the x86_64 qemu for i386 builds. While this is not
> incorrect, it's probably more sensible to use the i386 one, which will
> at least fail properly if we accidentally were to build a 64-bit kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Works for me:
[10:55:58] Testing complete. Ran 201 tests: passed: 165, skipped: 36
[10:55:58] Elapsed time: 21.268s total, 0.003s configuring, 4.009s
building, 16.967s running
Side note:
I ran into an unrelated bug where running on QEMU in general seems to
hang when you try to filter to a test suite that doesn't exist.
I've confirmed it happens on i386 before this patch, and it at least
also happens on x86_64.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists