linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: proximity: vl53l0x: Document optional supply and GPIO properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 14 May 2022 19:33:12 +0300
From:   Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@...il.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: proximity: vl53l0x: Document optional
 supply and GPIO properties

Hi Jonathan,

On 5/14/22 17:29, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2022 10:56:50 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/2022 21:13, Markuss Broks wrote:
>>> This patch adds the optional properties for the VL53L0X ToF sensor to the
>>> device-tree binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>
>> Wait, two days and three versions? Please give some time before
>> resending entire patchset.
> Yeah, several instances of this on the IIO list this week. Please
> let things sit for at least a few days between versions even if
> the requested changes are fairly minor.
>
>> Same comments apply as for v2 and v3...
>>
> I 'could' fix this up, but given you've not responded to Krzysztof
> I think I'd prefer you send a v5 in the second half of next week or
> later (to give time for other review) with the patch description
> change Krzysztof suggested made.
OK, good. I will give this version some time to settle and send a 
version with those fixes some time next week.
>
> Code wise the series looks fine to me.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
- Markuss