[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220514224002.vvmd43lnjkbsw2g3@skbuf>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 22:40:03 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Luka Perkov <luka.perkov@...tura.hr>,
Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: dsa: add out-of-band tagging
protocol
On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> This tagging protocol is designed for the situation where the link
> between the MAC and the Switch is designed such that the Destination
> Port, which is usually embedded in some part of the Ethernet Header, is
> sent out-of-band, and isn't present at all in the Ethernet frame.
>
> This can happen when the MAC and Switch are tightly integrated on an
> SoC, as is the case with the Qualcomm IPQ4019 for example, where the DSA
> tag is inserted directly into the DMA descriptors. In that case,
> the MAC driver is responsible for sending the tag to the switch using
> the out-of-band medium. To do so, the MAC driver needs to have the
> information of the destination port for that skb.
>
> This out-of-band tagging protocol is using the very beggining of the skb
> headroom to store the tag. The drawback of this approch is that the
> headroom isn't initialized upon allocating it, therefore we have a
> chance that the garbage data that lies there at allocation time actually
> ressembles a valid oob tag. This is only problematic if we are
> sending/receiving traffic on the master port, which isn't a valid DSA
> use-case from the beggining. When dealing from traffic to/from a slave
> port, then the oob tag will be initialized properly by the tagger or the
> mac driver through the use of the dsa_oob_tag_push() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
> ---
Why put the DSA pseudo-header at skb->head rather than push it using
skb_push()? I thought you were going to check for the presence of a DSA
header using something like skb->mac_len == ETH_HLEN + tag len, but
right now it sounds like treating garbage in the headroom as a valid DSA
tag is indeed a potential problem. If you can't sort that out using
information from the header offsets alone, maybe an skb extension is
required?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists