linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v20 8/8] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAOTY_9gReO45qVhd5-9UrDYsDkOeS+FZT2Dw2McVgZvK3jfeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 15 May 2022 06:45:24 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        "jason-jh.lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group 
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 8/8] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT_DITHER from enum

Hi, Matthias:

Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> 於 2022年5月13日 週五 下午3:42寫道：
>
> Hi Chun-Kuang,
>
> On 02/05/2022 00:54, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Matthias:
> >
> > Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> 於 2022年4月22日 週五 下午8:42寫道：
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 19/04/2022 11:41, jason-jh.lin wrote:
> >>> After mmsys and drm change DITHER enum to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
> >>> mmsys header can remove the useless DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER enum.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Chun-Kuang, I think it would make sense to take that through your tree as it
> >> depends on the previous patches.
> >>
> >> I provide you a stable tag so that you can take it:
> >> v5.18-next-vdso0-stable-tag
> >
> > After I take this tag, I find one checkpatch warning:
> >
> > WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys" appears
> > un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> > #670: FILE: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:390:
> > +               .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys",
> >
> > I think this tag lost one binding patch, it's better that this tag has
> > no this warning.
> >
>
> Sorry for the late reply I was sick.
> The warning is, because the stable branch misses commit:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.18-next/soc&id=81c5a41d10b968ea89d5f44fe1e5c2fc70289209
>
> So it's not a real issue and will go away once our branches land in upstream.
> Is it OK for you to ignore the issue?

It's OK for me, but the patch would go through different maintainer's
tree and I'm not sure it's OK for all of them. So I would wait for the
necessary patch land in upstream.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> > Regards,
> > Chun-Kuang.
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>>    include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 3 +--
> >>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> >>> index 59117d970daf..fb719fd1281c 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> >>> @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
> >>>        DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR,
> >>>        DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0,
> >>>        DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1,
> >>> -     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
> >>> -     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0 = DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
> >>> +     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
> >>>        DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER1,
> >>>        DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0,
> >>>        DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1,