linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v20 8/8] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 12:29:38 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc:     "jason-jh.lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group 
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 8/8] soc: mediatek: remove DDP_DOMPONENT_DITHER from
 enum



On 15/05/2022 00:45, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Matthias:
> 
> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> 於 2022年5月13日 週五 下午3:42寫道：
>>
>> Hi Chun-Kuang,
>>
>> On 02/05/2022 00:54, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
>>> Hi, Matthias:
>>>
>>> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> 於 2022年4月22日 週五 下午8:42寫道：
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19/04/2022 11:41, jason-jh.lin wrote:
>>>>> After mmsys and drm change DITHER enum to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
>>>>> mmsys header can remove the useless DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER enum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> Chun-Kuang, I think it would make sense to take that through your tree as it
>>>> depends on the previous patches.
>>>>
>>>> I provide you a stable tag so that you can take it:
>>>> v5.18-next-vdso0-stable-tag
>>>
>>> After I take this tag, I find one checkpatch warning:
>>>
>>> WARNING: DT compatible string "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys" appears
>>> un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
>>> #670: FILE: drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c:390:
>>> +               .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-mmsys",
>>>
>>> I think this tag lost one binding patch, it's better that this tag has
>>> no this warning.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply I was sick.
>> The warning is, because the stable branch misses commit:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/matthias.bgg/linux.git/commit/?h=v5.18-next/soc&id=81c5a41d10b968ea89d5f44fe1e5c2fc70289209
>>
>> So it's not a real issue and will go away once our branches land in upstream.
>> Is it OK for you to ignore the issue?
> 
> It's OK for me, but the patch would go through different maintainer's
> tree and I'm not sure it's OK for all of them. So I would wait for the
> necessary patch land in upstream.
> 

Ok makes sense. Sorry for the bad coordination from my side on this.

Regards,
Matthias

> Regards,
> Chun-Kuang.
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chun-Kuang.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 3 +--
>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> index 59117d970daf..fb719fd1281c 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> @@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
>>>>>         DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR,
>>>>>         DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0,
>>>>>         DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1,
>>>>> -     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
>>>>> -     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0 = DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER,
>>>>> +     DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0,
>>>>>         DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER1,
>>>>>         DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0,
>>>>>         DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF1,