[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <165272277894.181860.12420245970045700212.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 11:39:38 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: yukuai3@...wei.com, jack@...e.cz, paolo.valente@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 0/2] block, bfq: make bfq_has_work() more accurate
On Fri, 13 May 2022 10:35:05 +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Changes in v2:
> - add reviewed-by tag for patch 1
> - use WRITE_ONCE() for updating of 'bfqd->queued' in patch 2
>
> This patchset try to make bfq_has_work() more accurate, patch 1 is a
> small problem found by code review.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] block, bfq: protect 'bfqd->queued' by 'bfqd->lock'
commit: 181490d5321806e537dc5386db5ea640b826bf78
[2/2] block, bfq: make bfq_has_work() more accurate
commit: ddc25c86b466d2359b57bc7798f167baa1735a44
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists