linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 068/114] block: Do not call folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 21:36:42 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 068/114] block: Do not call folio_next() on an unreferenced folio

From: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>

[ Upstream commit 170f37d6aa6ad4582eefd7459015de79e244536e ]

It is unsafe to call folio_next() on a folio unless you hold a reference
on it that prevents it from being split or freed.  After returning
from the iterator, iomap calls folio_end_writeback() which may drop
the last reference to the page, or allow the page to be split.  If that
happens, the iterator will not advance far enough through the bio_vec,
leading to assertion failures like the BUG() in folio_end_writeback()
that checks we're not trying to end writeback on a page not currently
under writeback.  Other assertion failures were also seen, but they're
all explained by this one bug.

Fix the bug by remembering where the next folio starts before returning
from the iterator.  There are other ways of fixing this bug, but this
seems the simplest.

Reported-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Reported-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/bio.h | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index 117d7f248ac9..2ca54c084d5a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ struct folio_iter {
 	size_t offset;
 	size_t length;
 	/* private: for use by the iterator */
+	struct folio *_next;
 	size_t _seg_count;
 	int _i;
 };
@@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
 			PAGE_SIZE * (bvec->bv_page - &fi->folio->page);
 	fi->_seg_count = bvec->bv_len;
 	fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio) - fi->offset, fi->_seg_count);
+	fi->_next = folio_next(fi->folio);
 	fi->_i = i;
 }
 
@@ -293,9 +295,10 @@ static inline void bio_next_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	fi->_seg_count -= fi->length;
 	if (fi->_seg_count) {
-		fi->folio = folio_next(fi->folio);
+		fi->folio = fi->_next;
 		fi->offset = 0;
 		fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio), fi->_seg_count);
+		fi->_next = folio_next(fi->folio);
 	} else if (fi->_i + 1 < bio->bi_vcnt) {
 		bio_first_folio(fi, bio, fi->_i + 1);
 	} else {
-- 
2.35.1