linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.17 067/114] tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220516193627.416052786@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 May 2022 21:36:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 067/114] tcp: drop the hash_32() part from the index calculation

From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>

[ Upstream commit e8161345ddbb66e449abde10d2fdce93f867eba9 ]

In commit 190cc82489f4 ("tcp: change source port randomizarion at
connect() time"), the table_perturb[] array was introduced and an
index was taken from the port_offset via hash_32(). But it turns
out that hash_32() performs a multiplication while the input here
comes from the output of SipHash in secure_seq, that is well
distributed enough to avoid the need for yet another hash.

Suggested-by: Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
index cc5f66328b47..a5d57fa679ca 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ int __inet_hash_connect(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
 
 	net_get_random_once(table_perturb,
 			    INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SIZE * sizeof(*table_perturb));
-	index = hash_32(port_offset, INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SHIFT);
+	index = port_offset & (INET_TABLE_PERTURB_SIZE - 1);
 
 	offset = READ_ONCE(table_perturb[index]) + (port_offset >> 32);
 	offset %= remaining;
-- 
2.35.1