[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <305208c4-db8a-5751-2ffc-753751a70815@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 17:59:01 -0400
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
cohuck@...hat.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com,
pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, vneethv@...ux.ibm.com,
oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/22] vfio-pci/zdev: add open/close device hooks
On 5/16/22 2:35 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 02:30:46PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>
>> Conceptually I think this would work for QEMU anyway (it always sets the kvm
>> before we open the device). I tried to test the idea quickly but couldn't
>> get the following to apply on vfio-next or your vfio_group_locking -- but I
>> understand what you're trying to do so I'll re-work and try it out.
>
> I created it on 8c9350e9bf43de1ebab3cc8a80703671e6495ab4 which is the
> vfio_group_locking.. I can send you a github if it helps
> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/vfio_group_lockin
>
Thanks -- I was able to successfully test your proposed idea (+ some
changes to make it compile :)) on top of vfio_group_locking along with a
modified version of my zdev series. I also tried it out with vfio-ap
successfully, but have nothing to test GVT with.
That said, this has caused me to realize that 'iommu:
iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain' breaks s390x
vfio-pci :( I wonder if it is due to the way s390x PCI currently
switches between dma ops and iommu ops. It looks like it breaks vfio-ap
mdevs too, but I know less about that -- I will have to investigate
both more tomorrow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists