[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220516230552.GO1343366@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 20:05:52 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
cohuck@...hat.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com,
pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, vneethv@...ux.ibm.com,
oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 17/22] vfio-pci/zdev: add open/close device hooks
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 05:59:01PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 5/16/22 2:35 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 02:30:46PM -0400, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> >
> > > Conceptually I think this would work for QEMU anyway (it always sets the kvm
> > > before we open the device). I tried to test the idea quickly but couldn't
> > > get the following to apply on vfio-next or your vfio_group_locking -- but I
> > > understand what you're trying to do so I'll re-work and try it out.
> >
> > I created it on 8c9350e9bf43de1ebab3cc8a80703671e6495ab4 which is the
> > vfio_group_locking.. I can send you a github if it helps
> > https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/vfio_group_lockin
> >
> Thanks -- I was able to successfully test your proposed idea (+ some changes
> to make it compile :)) on top of vfio_group_locking along with a modified
> version of my zdev series. I also tried it out with vfio-ap successfully,
> but have nothing to test GVT with.
>
> That said, this has caused me to realize that 'iommu:
> iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain' breaks s390x
> vfio-pci :( I wonder if it is due to the way s390x PCI currently switches
> between dma ops and iommu ops. It looks like it breaks vfio-ap mdevs too,
> but I know less about that -- I will have to investigate both more
> tomorrow.
At the very least it appears that s390 thinks that attach/detach_dev
are strictly paired and that isn't how the iommu ops are defined.
attach_dev can be called multiple times without any detach_dev.
Possibly the unbalance of zpci_register_ioat / zpci_unregister_ioat
causes the trouble?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists