[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1cec6a09-9d80-99e7-ccc4-c918c6be7dbb@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 16:34:06 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, wenst@...omium.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: mt8186: Set #clock-cells as
required property
On 17/05/2022 12:15, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> This is a clock-controller binding, so it needs #clock-cells, or
> it would be of no use: add that to the list of required properties.
>
> Fixes: f113a51aa2cf ("dt-bindings: ARM: MediaTek: Add new document bindings of MT8186 clock")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8186-clock.yaml | 1 +
If these are clock controllers and new bindings, why they were added to
"arm" directory? arm is only for top-level stuff, not for devices.
In the future please put your bindings in respective subsystem matching
the hardware. Fallback is soc directory, not arm.
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists