lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220517150339.GI63055@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 12:03:39 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     longli@...rosoft.com
Cc:     "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] net: mana: Move header files to a common location

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 02:04:33AM -0700, longli@...uxonhyperv.com wrote:
> From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> 
> In preparation to add MANA RDMA driver, move all the required header files
> to a common location for use by both Ethernet and RDMA drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                                                   | 1 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/gdma_main.c               | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c              | 4 ++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_bpf.c                | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c                 | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_ethtool.c            | 2 +-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/shm_channel.c             | 2 +-
>  {drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/gdma.h | 0
>  .../ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/hw_channel.h    | 0
>  {drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/mana.h | 0
>  .../ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/shm_channel.h   | 0
>  11 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>  rename {drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/gdma.h (100%)
>  rename {drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/hw_channel.h (100%)
>  rename {drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/mana.h (100%)
>  rename {drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft => include/linux}/mana/shm_channel.h (100%)

I know mlx5 did it like this, but I wonder if include/net is more
appropriate?

Or maybe include/aux/?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ