lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1327ec95-f6b4-838d-f3f2-a115c2ab632b@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 May 2022 17:25:56 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Cc:     "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add USB2.0 device controller
 node

On 17/05/2022 17:21, Neal Liu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +		udc: udc@...a2000 {
>>>>
>>>> The same as DTS in bindings - generic node name, please.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use "udc: usb-udc@...a2000" to distinguish it between "vhub:
>> usb-vhub@...a0000"?
>>
>> Possible yes :), but not recommended and not wanted. Nodes should be generic
>> and prefixes are added only if there is no unit address. You can though use
>> some more descriptive label.
>>
> "udc: usb@...a2000" is okay for you?

Yes, it's perfect.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ