[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220518115119.2e618c39.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:51:19 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/uapi/linux/vfio.h: Fix trivial typo - _IORW
should be _IOWR instead
On Mon, 16 May 2022 12:12:02 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com> wrote:
> There is no macro called _IORW, so use _IOWR in the comment instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index fea86061b44e..733a1cddde30 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ enum {
> };
>
> /**
> - * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO - _IORW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12,
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 12,
> * struct vfio_pci_hot_reset_info)
> *
> * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure:
> @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ struct vfio_device_ioeventfd {
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_IOEVENTFD _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 16)
>
> /**
> - * VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE - _IORW(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17,
> + * VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 17,
> * struct vfio_device_feature)
> *
> * Get, set, or probe feature data of the device. The feature is selected
Applied to vfio next branch for v5.19. Thanks!
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists