[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5100b851-6787-fed8-a40f-7e6e64a123d8@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:24:21 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, wenst@...omium.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: arm: mt8186: Set #clock-cells as
required property
Il 17/05/22 16:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 17/05/2022 12:15, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> This is a clock-controller binding, so it needs #clock-cells, or
>> it would be of no use: add that to the list of required properties.
>>
>> Fixes: f113a51aa2cf ("dt-bindings: ARM: MediaTek: Add new document bindings of MT8186 clock")
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,mt8186-clock.yaml | 1 +
>
> If these are clock controllers and new bindings, why they were added to
> "arm" directory? arm is only for top-level stuff, not for devices.
>
> In the future please put your bindings in respective subsystem matching
> the hardware. Fallback is soc directory, not arm.
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
Hello Krzysztof,
I agree with you about these bindings belonging to the clock directory.
Should I add a patch to this series that moves all of the mtxxxx-clock
and mtxxxx-sys-clock yaml files to the clock directory?
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists