[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoTYm6Fo1vBUuJGu@osiris>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 13:29:31 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@...e.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"open list:S390" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] kexec, KEYS, s390: Make use of built-in and
secondary keyring for signature verification
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:01:23PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
>
> commit e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
> adds support for KEXEC_SIG verification with keys from platform keyring
> but the built-in keys and secondary keyring are not used.
>
> Add support for the built-in keys and secondary keyring as x86 does.
>
> Fixes: e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
As far as I can tell this doesn't have any dependency to the other
patches in this series, so should I pick this up for the s390 tree, or
how will this go upstream?
In any case:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists