[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220519003902.GE156677@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 08:39:02 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@...e.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"open list:S390" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] kexec, KEYS, s390: Make use of built-in and
secondary keyring for signature verification
On 05/18/22 at 01:29pm, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:01:23PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > From: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> >
> > commit e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
> > adds support for KEXEC_SIG verification with keys from platform keyring
> > but the built-in keys and secondary keyring are not used.
> >
> > Add support for the built-in keys and secondary keyring as x86 does.
> >
> > Fixes: e23a8020ce4e ("s390/kexec_file: Signature verification prototype")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> > Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
> > Reviewed-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>
> > Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> As far as I can tell this doesn't have any dependency to the other
> patches in this series, so should I pick this up for the s390 tree, or
> how will this go upstream?
Thanks, Heiko.
I want to ask Mimi if this can be taken into KEYS-ENCRYPTED tree.
Otherwise I will ask Andrew to help pick this whole series.
Surely, this patch 4 can be taken into s390 seperately since it's
independent, both looks good.
Thanks
Baoquan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists