linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Fix undefined behavior due to shift overflowing the constant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k0ajdq8t.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 14:39:14 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Fix undefined behavior due to shift
 overflowing the constant

On Wed, 18 May 2022, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:05:46PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/5/22 08:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> > 
>> > Fix:
>> > 
>> >   In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
>> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c: In function ‘intel_guc_send_mmio’:
>> >   ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:352:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1047’ \
>> >   declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: mask is not constant
>> >     _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>> > 
>> > and other build errors due to shift overflowing values.
>> > 
>> > See https://lore.kernel.org/r/YkwQ6%2BtIH8GQpuct@zn.tnic for the gory
>> > details as to why it triggers with older gccs only.
>> > 
>> 
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> 
>> Is this merged anywhere?
>
> It's state is "new" in their patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/480756/

Basically we run all patches through CI before merging, and because only
one patch was sent to intel-gfx, the CI just sat waiting for the rest of
the series to arrive...

Anyway, didn't really like the changes in i915_reg.h, sent my version of
that and the rest separately [1].

> so I guess not yet.
>
>> It could/should at least be in linux-next so that other people
>> don't waste time on it.
>
> -ETOOMANYPATCHES I guess. :-\

Yeah, sorry about that.


BR,
Jani.

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104122/


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center