lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoSj9O/6yA0nn/xW@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 09:44:52 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Fix undefined behavior due to shift
 overflowing the constant

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 04:05:46PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/5/22 08:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> > 
> > Fix:
> > 
> >   In file included from <command-line>:0:0:
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c: In function ‘intel_guc_send_mmio’:
> >   ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:352:38: error: call to ‘__compiletime_assert_1047’ \
> >   declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: mask is not constant
> >     _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
> > 
> > and other build errors due to shift overflowing values.
> > 
> > See https://lore.kernel.org/r/YkwQ6%2BtIH8GQpuct@zn.tnic for the gory
> > details as to why it triggers with older gccs only.
> > 
> 
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> 
> Is this merged anywhere?

It's state is "new" in their patchwork:

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/480756/

so I guess not yet.

> It could/should at least be in linux-next so that other people
> don't waste time on it.

-ETOOMANYPATCHES I guess. :-\

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ