[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92a21768-204d-fc68-8942-99e2bc3df4cf@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 17:14:33 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tushar Khandelwal <Tushar.Khandelwal@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mailbox: correct kerneldoc
On 19/05/2022 17:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 12:34:27PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Correct kerneldoc warnings like:
>>
>> drivers/mailbox/arm_mhu_db.c:47:
>> warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
>> drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c:58:
>> warning: Function parameter or member 'num_chans' not described in 'qcom_ipcc'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mailbox/arm_mhu_db.c | 2 +-
>
> I thought I had copied it from arm_mhuc.c but apparently not. Anyways,
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>
Thanks! Could someone pick these two patches?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists