[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72=e9LMujmsk-mh8YHcGoKuLAnBttNz7JbiXH_2-hpvUvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 19:50:09 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] clang-format: Fix empty curly braces
Hi Joe,
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 7:24 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> static inline void foo1(...) {}
> static inline void foo2(...) {}
> ...
> static inline void fooN(...) {}
Those are the non-wrapped-from-signature case, which are handled
before this option takes place, i.e. this option is about:
void f()
{}
vs.
void f()
{
}
For putting everything on the same line, we could adjust
`AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine` from `None` to `Empty`, though.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists