[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kaKhkcrTrOXiVZ_NA_FktJZhCqib-Fj0jWYztuiKPAQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 21:11:12 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix clang-format configuration according to checkpatch.pl
On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 6:00 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
>
> clang-format: Update and extend the for_each list with tools/
> clang-format: Update to clang-format >= 6
> clang-format: Fix goto labels indentation
> clang-format: Fix space after for_each macros
These 4 applied (with the mentioned changes, and on top of a few
cleanups to simplify the first patch etc.) in -next.
After -rc1, I will submit an RFC series with other clang-format 6..11
features that we can now enable but that merit more discussion.
Let's get the ball rolling! :)
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists