linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220520223025.GA359803-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 17:30:25 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer
 against memory bounds

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:35:47AM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
> in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and the
> ima-kexec-buffer was allocated beyond that range by the previous kernel.
> The panic is usually of the form below:
> 
> $ sudo kexec --initrd initrd vmlinux --append='mem=16G'
> 
> <snip>
>  BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc000c01fff7f0000
>  Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000837974
>  Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> <snip>
>  NIP [c000000000837974] ima_restore_measurement_list+0x94/0x6c0
>  LR [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
>  Call Trace:
>  [c00000000371fa80] [c00000000083b55c] ima_load_kexec_buffer+0xac/0x160
>  [c00000000371fb00] [c0000000020512c4] ima_init+0x80/0x108
>  [c00000000371fb70] [c0000000020514dc] init_ima+0x4c/0x120
>  [c00000000371fbf0] [c000000000012240] do_one_initcall+0x60/0x2c0
>  [c00000000371fcc0] [c000000002004ad0] kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x3ec
>  [c00000000371fda0] [c0000000000128a4] kernel_init+0x34/0x1b0
>  [c00000000371fe10] [c00000000000ce64] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64
>  Instruction dump:
>  f92100b8 f92100c0 90e10090 910100a0 4182050c 282a0017 3bc00000 40810330
>  7c0802a6 fb610198 7c9b2378 f80101d0 <a1240000> 2c090001 40820614 e9240010
>  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fix this issue by checking returned address/size of previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer against memblock's memory bounds.
> 
> Fixes: fee3ff99bc67("powerpc: Move arch independent ima kexec functions to
> drivers/of/kexec.c")

Your mailer (and/or you) corrupted this. There should be a space between 
the commit hash and subject, and it should not be wrapped.

It should also not have a blank line here.

But more importantly, how did this commit introduce the problem? It just 
moved the code and didn't have any such check.

> 
> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
> Cc: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/kexec.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/kexec.c b/drivers/of/kexec.c
> index b9bd1cff1793..c73007eda52d 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/kexec.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/kexec.c
> @@ -140,6 +140,13 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	/* if the ima-kexec-buffer goes beyond the addressable memory */
> +	if (!memblock_is_region_memory(tmp_addr, tmp_size)) {
> +		pr_warn("IMA buffer at 0x%lx, size = 0x%zx beyond memory\n",
> +			tmp_addr, tmp_size);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	*addr = __va(tmp_addr);
>  	*size = tmp_size;
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 
>