[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e0f7f48-ecfd-16be-8672-aa4ba11b0c91@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 02:11:05 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: watchdog: toshiba,visconti-wdt: Update
the common clock properties
On 5/20/22 02:00, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> The clock for this driver switched to the common clock controller driver.
> Therefore, update common clock properties for watchdog in the binding document.
> And this matched this example with the actual dts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml | 13 ++++---------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml
> index 690e19ce4b87..52c0e0c022ea 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml
> @@ -35,20 +35,15 @@ additionalProperties: false
>
> examples:
> - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h>
> +
> soc {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <2>;
>
> - wdt_clk: wdt-clk {
> - compatible = "fixed-clock";
> - clock-frequency = <150000000>;
> - #clock-cells = <0>;
> - };
> -
> - watchdog@...30000 {
> + wdt: watchdog@...30000 {
> compatible = "toshiba,visconti-wdt";
> reg = <0 0x28330000 0 0x1000>;
> - clocks = <&wdt_clk>;
> - timeout-sec = <20>;
> + clocks = <&pismu TMPV770X_CLK_WDTCLK>;
> };
> };
wdt: isn't needed in the example, and I question if it
really improves the quality of the example to remove
timeout-sec.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists