[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YoeMW+/KGk8VpbED@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:40:59 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Cc: vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
dan.carpenter@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:40:17PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Accidentally noticed, that this driver is the only user of
> while (timer_after(jiffies...)).
>
> It looks like typo, because likely this while loop will finish after 1st
> iteration, because time_after() returns true when 1st argument _is after_
> 2nd one.
>
> Fix it by negating time_after return value inside while loops statement
A better fix would be to use one of the helpers in linux/iopoll.h.
There is a second bug in the current code:
static int ocelot_fdma_wait_chan_safe(struct ocelot *ocelot, int chan)
{
unsigned long timeout;
u32 safe;
timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(OCELOT_FDMA_CH_SAFE_TIMEOUT_US);
do {
safe = ocelot_fdma_readl(ocelot, MSCC_FDMA_CH_SAFE);
if (safe & BIT(chan))
return 0;
} while (time_after(jiffies, timeout));
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
The scheduler could put the thread to sleep, and it does not get woken
up for OCELOT_FDMA_CH_SAFE_TIMEOUT_US. During that time, the hardware
has done its thing, but you exit the while loop and return -ETIMEDOUT.
linux/iopoll.h handles this correctly by testing the state one more
time after the timeout has expired.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists