[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <053b0099-6d01-c3a6-f43f-df5ef0424d5c@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:48:25 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: lan966x: Add UDPHS support
On 20/05/2022 14:37, Herve Codina wrote:
>> Generic node names, so it looks like usb. For example HCD schema
>> requires it. I am not sure which bindings are used here, but anyway once
>> they might require usb...
>>
>
> HCD are related to the Host controller.
> Here we are talking about a device.
>
> In existing bindings related to USB device (or OTG as an OTG can be a
> host or a device) on several SOCs, we can find:
> - usb1: gadget@...a4000
> - usb_otg: usb@...3000
> - usb: usb@...00000
> - udc: usb@...40000
> - usb_otg_hs: usb_otg_hs@...ab000
>
>
> So I will change to
> udc: usb@...08000
>
> Is that ok for you ?
Yes, I proposed usb.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists