[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220523165808.093124227@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 19:05:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Jérôme Pouiller
<jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 33/68] dma-buf: fix use of DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_{A,B} in userspace
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
commit 7c3e9fcad9c7d8bb5d69a576044fb16b1d2e8a01 upstream.
The typedefs u32 and u64 are not available in userspace. Thus user get
an error he try to use DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A or DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
$ gcc -Wall -c -MMD -c -o ioctls_list.o ioctls_list.c
In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/asm/ioctl.h:1,
from /usr/include/linux/ioctl.h:5,
from /usr/include/asm-generic/ioctls.h:5,
from ioctls_list.c:11:
ioctls_list.c:463:29: error: ‘u32’ undeclared here (not in a function)
463 | { "DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A", DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A, -1, -1 }, // linux/dma-buf.h
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ioctls_list.c:464:29: error: ‘u64’ undeclared here (not in a function)
464 | { "DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B", DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B, -1, -1 }, // linux/dma-buf.h
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The issue was initially reported here[1].
[1]: https://github.com/jerome-pouiller/ioctl/pull/14
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Fixes: a5bff92eaac4 ("dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220517072708.245265-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
* between them in actual uapi, they're just different numbers.
*/
#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
-#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
-#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, __u32)
+#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, __u64)
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists