linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: SVM: remove avic's broken code that updated APIC ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YovCFBn5cKcv3iwD@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 17:19:16 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 03/19] KVM: x86: SVM: remove avic's broken code
 that updated APIC ID

On Sun, May 22, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-05-19 at 16:10 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > AVIC is now inhibited if the guest changes apic id, thus remove
> > > that broken code.
> > 
> > Can you explicitly call out what's broken?  Just something short on the code not
> > handling the scenario where APIC ID is changed back to vcpu_id to help future
> > archaeologists.  I forget if there are other bugs...
> > 
> 
> 
> Well, the avic_handle_apic_id_update is called each time the AVIC is uninhibited,
> because while it is inhibited, the AVIC code doesn't track changes to APIC ID and such.
> 
> Also there are many ways it is broken for example
> 
> 1. a CPU can't move its APIC ID to a free slot due to (!new) check
> 
> 2. If APIC ID is moved to a used slot, then the CPU that used that overwritten
> slot can't correctly move it, since its now not its slot, not to mention races.

The more the merrier :-)  Any/all of those examples are great, just so long as it's
obvious to future readers that the code truly is busted.

> BTW, if you see a value in it, I can fix this code instead - a lock + going over all the apic ids,
> should be quite easy to implement. In case of two vCPUs using the same APIC ID,
> I can write non present entry to the table, so none will be able to be addressed,
> hoping that the situation is only temporary.

Very strong "no", let's keep this as simple as possible without outright killing
the guest or breaking ABI.  Disabling APICv/AVIC is perfect.