[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f1f48e2-a54d-58d6-8946-853cffeb55df@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 11:24:02 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@...iatek.com>, hch@....de
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
yj.chiang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dma-mapping, remoteproc: Fix dma_mem leak after
rproc_shutdown
On 2022-05-23 11:15, Mark-PK Tsai wrote:
>> Sigh. In theory drivers should never declare coherent memory like
>> this, and there has been some work to fix remoteproc in that regard.
>>
>> But I guess until that is merged we'll need somthing like this fix.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
> As I didn't see other fix of this issue, should we use this patch
> before the remoteproc work you mentioned is merged?
TBH I think it would be better "fixed" with a kmemleak_ignore() and a
big comment, rather than adding API cruft for something that isn't a
real problem. I'm quite sure that no real-world user is unbinding
remoteproc drivers frequently enough that leaking a 48-byte allocation
each time has any practical significance.
Thanks,
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists