linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: fsd: Add ADC device tree node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 12:22:14 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Tamseel Shams <m.shams@...sung.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
        lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     geert@...ux-m68k.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        paul@...pouillou.net, linux-fsd@...la.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: fsd: Add ADC device tree node

On 20/05/2022 16:58, Tamseel Shams wrote:
> From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> 
> This patch adds ADC device tree node and enables the same
> on fsd platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tamseel Shams <m.shams@...sung.com>
> ---
> - Changes since v1
> * Addressed Krzysztof's comment for corrections in dt files
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts |  4 ++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd.dtsi    | 11 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> index 5af560c1b5e6..63f26a85053a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/tesla/fsd-evb.dts
> @@ -34,6 +34,10 @@
>  	clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>  };
>  
> +&adc {
> +	status = "okay";

Please test your bindings (`make dtbs_check`). There is no way it passes
since you miss at least supply (maybe more?).




Best regards,
Krzysztof