lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <266f4fe2-e8b8-24f2-085d-fcdb87f90731@xilinx.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 May 2022 11:09:49 -0700
From:   Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <michal.simek@...inx.com>
CC:     <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add Xilinx RPU subsystem
 bindings

On 5/24/22 10:28 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/05/2022 17:43, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> With this, I will add 'maxItems: 8' in sram and memory-region properties.
>>
>> If everything else looks good on schema in this revision, could you
>> please also review next (dts) patch in this series?
>>
>> If that looks good, can I get your 'rb' on that?
>>
>> so we can reduce scope of reviews for next revisions?
> There is no need to resend after receiving a tag, so the amount of
> reviews/versions won't change.

Ok. So, is it fine if I send new revision once dts patch is reviewed.

That way I can take care of any fixes in dts patch along with bindings 
in next version.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ