[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220525224254.GF1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:42:54 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] rcu/nocb: Pass a cpumask instead of a single CPU to
offload/deoffload
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:19:17AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:10:52AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > @@ -1117,12 +1111,6 @@ static long rcu_nocb_rdp_offload(void *arg)
> > struct rcu_data *rdp_gp = rdp->nocb_gp_rdp;
> >
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->cpu != raw_smp_processor_id());
> > - /*
> > - * For now we only support re-offload, ie: the rdp must have been
> > - * offloaded on boot first.
> > - */
> > - if (!rdp->nocb_gp_rdp)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> >
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp_gp->nocb_gp_kthread))
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> And why did I remove this critical check? I have no answer...
Me, I was going to ask if rcutorture should (de)offload multiple
CPUs in one go... ;-)
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists