[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yo/FGcG+uiBh88sT@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 08:21:13 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpuset: Support RCU-NOCB toggle on v2 root
partitions
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:10:55AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Introduce a new "isolation.rcu_nocb" file within a cgroup2/cpuset
> directory which provides support for a set of CPUs to either enable ("1")
> or disable ("0") RCU callbacks offloading (aka. RCU NOCB). This can
> overwrite previous boot settings towards "rcu_nocbs=" kernel parameter.
>
> The file is only writeable on "root" type partitions to exclude any
> overlap. The deepest root type partition has the highest priority.
> This means that given the following setting:
>
> Top cpuset (CPUs: 0-7)
> cpuset.isolation.rcu_nocb = 0
> |
> |
> Subdirectory A (CPUs: 5-7)
> cpuset.cpus.partition = root
> cpuset.isolation.rcu_nocb = 0
> |
> |
> Subdirectory B (CPUs: 7)
> cpuset.cpus.partition = root
> cpuset.isolation.rcu_nocb = 1
>
> the result is that only CPU 7 is in rcu_nocb mode.
>
> Note that "rcu_nocbs" kernel parameter must be passed on boot, even
> without a cpulist, so that nocb support is enabled.
Does it even make sense to make this hierarchical? What's wrong with a
cpumask under sys/ or proc/?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists