linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Convert SC7180 MSS bindings to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <90645ff6-0446-af02-08fe-d8f022de941a@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 11:00:40 +0530
From:   Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <ohad@...ery.com>, <agross@...nel.org>,
        <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: Convert SC7180 MSS
 bindings to YAML



On 5/24/22 11:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/05/2022 04:00, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> Hey Rob/Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 5/21/22 8:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 21/05/2022 00:40, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:17:05PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>>>>> Convert SC7180 MSS PIL loading bindings to YAML.
>>>>
>>>> I suppose there is a reason the sc7180 is being split out and the only
>>>> one converted, but this doesn't tell me.
>>>
>>> I am also confused, especially that last time I pointed out that there
>>> is work already:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220511161602.117772-7-sireeshkodali1@gmail.com/
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/e3543961-1645-b02a-c869-f8fa1ad2d41c@quicinc.com/#t
>>
>> The reason for the split was discussed on the list ^^, thought it
>> wouldn't make much sense adding any of it to the commit message.
>> Also since Krzysztof said he wanted a alignment between Sireesh/me
>> we did exchange mails saying I'll take care of SC7180/SC7280 (since
>> they had pas compatible which is overridden by mss compatible) and
>> he could continue with the rest.
> 
> 
> Sounds good to me, but Rob's got a point - this background should be
> better explained.
> 

ack

-Sibi

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>