[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <289d0c88-36a0-afd4-4d47-f2db3fb63654@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:32:36 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v12 00/17] KVM: x86/pmu: Add basic support to
enable guest PEBS via DS
On 25/5/2022 4:14 pm, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 5/25/22 09:56, Like Xu wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>> Some kvm x86 selftests have been failing due to this issue even after the last
>> commit.
>>
>> I blame myself for not passing the msr_info->host_initiated to the
>> intel_is_valid_msr(),
>> meanwhile I pondered further whether we should check only the MSR addrs range in
>> the kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr() and apply this kind of sanity check in the
>> pmu_set/get_msr().
>>
>> Vitaly && Paolo, any preference to move forward ?
>
> I'm not sure what I did wrong to not see the failure, so I'll fix it myself.
More info, some Skylake hosts fail the tests like x86_64/state_test due to this
issue.
>
> But from now on, I'll have a hard rule of no new processor features enabled
> without KVM unit tests or selftests. In fact, it would be nice if you wrote
> some for PEBS.
Great, my team (or at least me) is committed to contributing more tests on vPMU
features.
We may update the process document to the
Documentation/virt/kvm/review-checklist.rst.
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists