linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] objtool: Add R

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 11:40:54 -0500
From:   Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, peterz@...radead.org,
        aik@...abs.ru, sv@...ux.ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mbenes@...e.cz, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] objtool: Add R_REL32 macro

Hi!

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 05:58:15PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> In order to allow other architectures than x86 to use 32 bits
> relative relocations, define a R_REL32 macro that each architecture
> will define, in the same way as already done for R_NONE.

What are the expected semantics of this relocation?  It is PC-relative,
sure, but what is the destination?  S+A-P always?  That works for both
x86-64 and for PowerPC, but it should be written doen somewhere :-)


Segher