[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8e5878f-113e-dc81-2326-472cd9122088@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 17:03:47 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"sv@...ux.ibm.com" <sv@...ux.ibm.com>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"mbenes@...e.cz" <mbenes@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] Revert "objtool: Enable objtool to run only on
files with ftrace enabled"
Le 25/05/2022 à 18:34, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 05:58:14PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> This reverts commit cf3013dfad89ad5ac7d16d56dced72d7c138a20e.
>>
>> That commit is problematic as we miss some static calls.
>
> Revert ?!?! who comitted this. And there's a ton more broken than just
> static calls. This must absolutely not be.
No worry, it is just a follow-up of my previous series which includes it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists