lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9rFnx98FCVd9-HHdxMCwp_M9a7C5yd_pkA7TvrMLGM=kkOww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 10:03:48 -0700
From:   Brad Larson <brad@...sando.io>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        David Clear <dac2@...sando.io>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for Pensando Elba SoC

Hi Sergey,

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:37 AM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > [PATCH 04/11] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for Pensando Elba SoC
>
> I think you need to be more specific in the patch title to what bindings
> you are adding the new compatible string. Something like this
> "dt-bindings: spi: cdns: ..."
> The same concerns the patch "[PATCH 03/11] dt-bindings: mmc: Add Pensando
> Elba SoC binding".
> Otherwise it isn't clear to what schema you are adding the Elba SoC
> support to.

Thanks for the review, I'll add more specifics to the bindings patch title.

Regards,
Brad

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ