linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yo5jGMMctUP7i2dI@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 10:10:48 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Richard Fontana <fontana@...rpeleven.org>
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeyu@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        bvanassche@....org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, joe@...ches.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, minchan@...nel.org,
        linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>,
        Kuno Woudt <kuno@...b.nl>,
        copyleft-next@...ts.fedorahosted.org,
        Ciaran Farrell <Ciaran.Farrell@...e.com>,
        Christopher De Nicolo <Christopher.DeNicolo@...e.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 11:10:37PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29 2021 at 11:44, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > preferred. A summary of benefits why projects outside of Linux might
> > prefer to use copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 over GPLv2:
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > o copyleft-next has a 'built-in or-later' provision
> 
> Not convinced that this is a benefit under all circumstances,

I'll just drop it.

> but that's
> a philosopical problem. The real problem is this:


> > +Valid-License-Identifier: copyleft-next-0.3.1
> 
> and

Why is this an issue?

> > +11. Later License Versions
> > +
> > +    The Copyleft-Next Project may release new versions of copyleft-next,
> > +    designated by a distinguishing version number ("Later Versions").
> > +    Unless I explicitly remove the option of Distributing Covered Works
> > +    under Later Versions, You may Distribute Covered Works under any Later
> > +    Version.
> 
> If I want to remove this option, then how do I express this with a SPDX
> license identifier?

Good question, souinds like generic semantics for SPDX evolution?

  Luis