[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220527003006.76a52390841f7fba9680d636@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 00:30:06 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
Cc: <guoren@...nel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<lkp@...el.com>, <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<jszhang@...nel.org>, <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] csky/kprobe: reclaim insn_slot on kprobe unregistration
On Wed, 25 May 2022 16:02:41 +0800
Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com> wrote:
> On kprobe registration kernel allocate one insn_slot for new kprobe,
> but it forget to reclaim the insn_slot on unregistration, leading to a
> potential leakage.
>
> Reported-by: Chen Guokai <chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
This looks good to me too. I think this should go through csky tree.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you,
> ---
> arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index 42920f25e73c..661da54b418f 100644
> --- a/arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/csky/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
>
> void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> + if (p->ainsn.api.insn) {
> + free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.api.insn, 0);
> + p->ainsn.api.insn = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists