[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548a60d7-80bb-7551-cdc1-f9a58071a76b@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 12:56:42 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the original pte
On 5/27/2022 11:42 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:36 PM Baolin Wang
> <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> That is caused by commit:
>>
>> 00df1f1a133b ("mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the original
>> pte")
>>
>> interacting with commit:
>>
>> fb396bb459c1 ("arm64/hugetlb: Drop TLB flush from get_clear_flush()")
>>
>> And Catalin has fixed the conflict with below changes [1], not sure why
>> it is not merged.
>
> Argh. Nobody informed me (or if they did, I clearly missed it).
>
>> Linus, should I send a proper patch to fix this conflict for you?
>
> Yeah, somebody please send me a proper tested fix-up patch with commit
> message etc.
Sure. I send out a fix patch [1] which is already tested in linux-next
for several days.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/814e20c19b110209ee12ecae7cb05f8a78d021c8.1653625820.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists