[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjgGW_jsjZxKLcKCf4Di22vzJU6K56j0Oe8Td6RgKrc+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 20:42:54 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the original pte
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:36 PM Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> That is caused by commit:
>
> 00df1f1a133b ("mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the original
> pte")
>
> interacting with commit:
>
> fb396bb459c1 ("arm64/hugetlb: Drop TLB flush from get_clear_flush()")
>
> And Catalin has fixed the conflict with below changes [1], not sure why
> it is not merged.
Argh. Nobody informed me (or if they did, I clearly missed it).
> Linus, should I send a proper patch to fix this conflict for you?
Yeah, somebody please send me a proper tested fix-up patch with commit
message etc.
Thanks,
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists