linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: bitops: Change _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04c05bd5-63c7-bbac-889c-6e9897f7b990@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 10:37:33 +0200
From:   Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARC: bitops: Change __fls to return unsigned long

On 5/26/2022 5:42 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 5/25/22 07:48, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>> As per asm-generic definition and other architectures __fls should
>> return unsigned long.
>>
>> No functional change is expected as return value should fit in unsigned
>> long.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński<amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Applied to for-curr.
> 
> Thx,
> -Vineet

And apparently __fls is defined in two places in ARC header and I only 
changed one, should I send incremental patch on top of already merged 
one or v2?