linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: PCI: socionext,uniphier-pcie: Add missing child interrupt controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82815ff7-08ad-5f31-a249-448f990863e5@socionext.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 18:27:22 +0900
From:   Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: PCI: socionext,uniphier-pcie: Add missing
 child interrupt controller

On 2022/05/26 21:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 4:02 AM Kunihiko Hayashi
> <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 2022/05/26 6:01, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> The Socionext interrupt controller internal to the the PCI block isn't
>>> documented which causes warnings when unevaluatedProperties check is
>>> also fixed. Add the 'interrupt-controller' child node and properties and
>>> fixup the example so that interrupt properties can be parsed.
>>
>> Surely internal interrupt controller isn't described, and should be
>> documented.
>> And the child node name "legacy-interrupt-controller" also should be
>> fixed.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>>
>> BTW I can't reproduce such warnings with my environment.
>> Can you show the command line to reproduce the warnings?
> 
> "causes warnings when unevaluatedProperties check is also fixed"
> 
> You won't. I have a fix in dtschema pending, but first all the
> warnings that appear need to be fixed.
I understand. I don't care abort the warning on the way to fix.

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi