lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 16:30:34 +0530
From:   Harsh Agarwal <quic_harshq@...cinc.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Add support for multiport
 related properties


On 5/26/2022 6:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2022 15:43:48 +0530, Harsh Agarwal wrote:
>> Added support for multiport, mport, num-ssphy and num-hsphy
>> properties. These properties are used to support devices having
>> a multiport controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harsh Agarwal <quic_harshq@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml         | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml:366:8: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 7 (indentation)
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml:367:10: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 11 but found 9 (indentation)
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml:369:11: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 11 but found 10 (indentation)
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.example.dts:86.27-89.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-2/usb@...00000/multiport/mport@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.example.dts:91.27-93.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-2/usb@...00000/multiport/mport@2: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.example.dts:95.27-97.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-2/usb@...00000/multiport/mport@3: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.example.dts:99.27-101.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-2/usb@...00000/multiport/mport@4: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.example.dtb: usb@...00000: multiport: 'mport' is a required property
> 	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml
>
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
>
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
>
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
> Please check and re-submit.
Indentation error I have rectified in my RFC v2.
Regarding below warnings

"Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.example.dts:86.27-89.15: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /example-2/usb@...00000/multiport/mport@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property"
  
Here the mport expects no "reg" or ranges" property as of now. Only thing that is mandated is either the USB-PHY phandles using "usb-phy" or the Generic PHY declaration using "phy" and "phy-names"
Can you please suggest to mask these warnings or do I need to add something else ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ