linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-af: fix operand size in bitwise operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220527173915.1c30cdb7@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 17:39:15 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Shijith Thotton <sthotton@...vell.com>
Cc:     Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <jerinj@...vell.com>,
        <sgoutham@...vell.com>, Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>,
        hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "open list:MARVELL OCTEONTX2 RVU ADMIN FUNCTION DRIVER" 
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] octeontx2-af: fix operand size in bitwise operation

On Fri, 27 May 2022 13:29:28 +0530 Shijith Thotton wrote:
> Made size of operands same in bitwise operations.
> 
> The patch fixes the klocwork issue, operands in a bitwise operation
> have different size at line 375 and 483.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@...vell.com>

# Form letter - net-next is closed

We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.19
and therefore net-next is closed for new drivers, features,
code refactoring and optimizations. We are currently accepting
bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.19-rc1 is cut.

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.