| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 00:46:11 +0000
From: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>
To: Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com>
CC: "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
"mkl@...gutronix.de" <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@...inx.com>,
Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
git <git@...inx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add Transmitter delay compensation (TDC)
feature support
Hi Vincent,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2022 6:01 AM
> To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>
> Cc: wg@...ndegger.com; mkl@...gutronix.de; davem@...emloft.net;
> edumazet@...gle.com; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> <appanad@...inx.com>; Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>; Michal Simek
> <michals@...inx.com>; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; linux-
> can@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; git
> <git@...inx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add Transmitter delay compensation
> (TDC) feature support
>
> On Fri. 27 May 2022 at 00:51, Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com> wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com>
> > > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2022 6:54 AM
> > > To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>
> > > Cc: wg@...ndegger.com; mkl@...gutronix.de; davem@...emloft.net;
> > > edumazet@...gle.com; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> > > <appanad@...inx.com>; Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>; Michal
> Simek
> > > <michals@...inx.com>; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com; linux-
> > > can@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; git
> > > <git@...inx.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add Transmitter delay
> > > compensation
> > > (TDC) feature support
> > >
> > > On Fri. 13 May 2022 at 07:30, Srinivas Neeli
> > > <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Added Transmitter delay compensation (TDC) feature support.
> > > > In the case of higher measured loop delay with higher baud rates,
> > > > observed bit stuff errors.
> > > > By enabling the TDC feature in a controller, will compensate for
> > > > the measure loop delay in the receive path.
> > > > TDC feature requires BRP values can be 1 or 2.
> > > > The current CAN framework does not limit the brp so while using
> > > > TDC, have to restrict BRP values.
> > > > Ex:
> > > > ip link set can0 type can tq 12 prop-seg 39 phase-seg1 20
> > > > phase-seg2
> > > > 20 sjw 20 dtq 12 dprop-seg 5 dphase-seg1 6 dphase-seg2 4 dsjw 4 fd
> > > > on loopback on tdco 12 tdc-mode auto
> > >
> > > Did you experience some cases in which you had BRP > 2 and saw
> > > transmission errors due to the absence of delay compensation? Could
> > > you show the calculated values?
> > > Usually, you start to observe but stuff error at high bitrates (e.g.
> > > ~5MBPS), and for such bitrates, time quanta has to be small which
> > > then results in a small BRP.
> >
> > yes, we observed errors with higher baud rates(4 and 5 MBPS).
> > Observation:
> > BRPA 1Mbps Sampling 75%
> > BRPD 5MBPS Sampling 75%
> > On NXP PHY observed a delay of 160 ns. so observing the failure.
> > After enabling the TDC feature to work fine.
>
> Can you also share the results of:
>
> | ip --details link show can0
>
> for both the automatic calculation by the CAN framework and for your hand
> calculated values?
ip --details link show can6
root@...inx-vck190-2021_1:~# ip --details link show can6
9: can6: <NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP,ECHO> mtu 72 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/can promiscuity 0 minmtu 0 maxmtu 0
can <FD> state ERROR-ACTIVE (berr-counter tx 0 rx 0) restart-ms 0
bitrate 999999 sample-point 0.750
tq 250 prop-seg 1 phase-seg1 1 phase-seg2 1 sjw 1
xilinx_can: tseg1 1..256 tseg2 1..128 sjw 1..128 brp 2..256 brp-inc 1
dbitrate 4999999 dsample-point 0.750
dtq 50 dprop-seg 1 dphase-seg1 1 dphase-seg2 1 dsjw 1
xilinx_can: dtseg1 1..32 dtseg2 1..16 dsjw 1..16 dbrp 2..256 dbrp-inc 1
clock 79999999 numtxqueues 1 numrxqueues 1 gso_max_size 65536 gso_max_segs 65535
root@...inx-vck190-2021_1:~#
Hand calculated values:
ip link set can0 type can tq 12 prop-seg 39 phase-seg1 20 phase-seg2 20 sjw 20 dtq 12 dprop-seg 5 dphase-seg1 6 dphase-seg2 4 dsjw 4 fd on
Observations:
---------------
Board VCK190 +NXP phy.
Observed TDCV value generated by IP is 9clock cycles(112ns)[Choosing Falling edge of bit].
But Bit starts on rx line after 160 ns observed with scope.
Exp1:
BRPA 1Mbps Sampling 75%
BRPD 5MBPS Sampling 75%
Without TDC feature:
Bit length 200ns, Sampling point 75% means 150ns.
IP tries to sample at 150ns , but Bit starting at 160ns,so observed failure.
With TDC feature:
Bit length 200ns, Sampling point 75%, TDCO =12clock cycles(150ns).
Ip tries after 112+150 = 262ns,able to sample the bit.
Thank you!
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > > > b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c index e2b15d29d15e..7af518fbed02
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/xilinx_can.c
> > > > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> > > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > > > /* Xilinx CAN device driver
> > > > *
> > > > - * Copyright (C) 2012 - 2014 Xilinx, Inc.
> > > > + * Copyright (C) 2012 - 2022 Xilinx, Inc.
> > > > * Copyright (C) 2009 PetaLogix. All rights reserved.
> > > > * Copyright (C) 2017 - 2018 Sandvik Mining and Construction Oy
> > > > *
> > > > @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ enum xcan_reg {
> > > > #define XCAN_DLCR_BRS_MASK 0x04000000 /* BRS Mask in DLC
> */
> > > >
> > > > /* CAN register bit shift - XCAN_<REG>_<BIT>_SHIFT */
> > > > +#define XCAN_BRPR_TDCO_SHIFT_CANFD 8 /* Transmitter Delay
> > > Compensation Offset */
> > >
> > > Having CANFD in the name is redundant (TDC implies CANFD).
> > > #define XCAN_BRPR_TDCO_SHIFT 8
> > update in V2.
> >
> > >
> > > > +#define XCAN_BRPR_TDCE_SHIFT_CANFD 16 /* Transmitter Delay
> > > Compensation (TDC) Enable */
> > >
> > > Why not:
> > > #define XCAN_BRPR_TDC_ENABLE BIT(16)
> > update in V2.
> >
> > >
> > > > #define XCAN_BTR_SJW_SHIFT 7 /* Synchronous jump width */
> > > > #define XCAN_BTR_TS2_SHIFT 4 /* Time segment 2 */
> > > > #define XCAN_BTR_SJW_SHIFT_CANFD 16 /* Synchronous jump
> width
> > > */
> > > > @@ -259,7 +261,7 @@ static const struct can_bittiming_const
> > > xcan_bittiming_const_canfd2 = {
> > > > .tseg2_min = 1,
> > > > .tseg2_max = 128,
> > > > .sjw_max = 128,
> > > > - .brp_min = 2,
> > > > + .brp_min = 1,
> > >
> > > Was there any reason to have brp_min = 2 in the first place?
> > > I think this change should be a different patch. If the brp_min = 2
> > > is just a typo, you might also want to backport it to stable branches.
> >
> > On early silicon engineering samples we observed bit shrinking issue when
> we use brp =1 , hence we updated brp_min =2.
> > As in production silicon this issue is fixed we are planning to revert the
> patch.
>
> Great!
>
> > > > .brp_max = 256,
> > > > .brp_inc = 1,
> > > > };
> > > > @@ -272,11 +274,21 @@ static struct can_bittiming_const
> > > xcan_data_bittiming_const_canfd2 = {
> > > > .tseg2_min = 1,
> > > > .tseg2_max = 16,
> > > > .sjw_max = 16,
> > > > - .brp_min = 2,
> > > > + .brp_min = 1,
> > > > .brp_max = 256,
> > > > .brp_inc = 1,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +/* Transmission Delay Compensation constants for CANFD2.0 and
> > > > +Versal */ static const struct can_tdc_const xcan_tdc_const = {
> > > > + .tdcv_min = 0,
> > > > + .tdcv_max = 0, /* Manual mode not supported. */
> > >
> > > Right, had a look at the datasheet and xilinx indeed does not
> > > support setting TDCV.
> > > However, xilinx still has a TDCV register to report the measured
> > > transmission delay.
> > >
> > > Socket CAN's TDC framework provides can_priv::do_get_auto_tdcv() to
> > > report the measured value through the netlink interface:
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17/source/include/linux/can/dev.
> > > h#L87
> > >
> > > Can you implement this call back function?
> > Will implement in V2.
> >
> > >
> > > > + .tdco_min = 0,
> > > > + .tdco_max = 64,
> > > > + .tdcf_min = 0, /* Filter window not supported */
> > > > + .tdcf_max = 0,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > /**
> > > > * xcan_write_reg_le - Write a value to the device register little endian
> > > > * @priv: Driver private data structure
> > > > @@ -425,6 +437,11 @@ static int xcan_set_bittiming(struct
> > > > net_device
> > > *ndev)
> > > > priv->devtype.cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0) {
> > > > /* Setting Baud Rate prescalar value in F_BRPR Register */
> > > > btr0 = dbt->brp - 1;
> > > > + if (can_tdc_is_enabled(&priv->can)) {
> > > > + btr0 = btr0 |
> > > > + (priv->can.tdc.tdco) << XCAN_BRPR_TDCO_SHIFT_CANFD
> |
> > > > + 1 << XCAN_BRPR_TDCE_SHIFT_CANFD;
> > >
> > > I don't think the parenthesis around (priv->can.tdc.tdco) are needed.
> > Yes, will update.
> > >
> > > btr0 = btr0 |
> > > priv->can.tdc.tdco << XCAN_BRPR_TDCO_SHIFT |
> > > XCAN_BRPR_TDC_ENABLE
> > >
> > > (c.f. above for macro names)
> > >
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > /* Setting Time Segment 1 in BTR Register */
> > > > btr1 = dbt->prop_seg + dbt->phase_seg1 - 1; @@
> > > > -1747,13 +1764,16 @@ static int xcan_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> > > > priv->can.data_bittiming_const =
> > > > &xcan_data_bittiming_const_canfd;
> > > >
> > > > - if (devtype->cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0)
> > > > + if (devtype->cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0) {
> > > > priv->can.data_bittiming_const =
> > > > &xcan_data_bittiming_const_canfd2;
> > > > + priv->can.tdc_const = &xcan_tdc_const;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > if (devtype->cantype == XAXI_CANFD ||
> > > > devtype->cantype == XAXI_CANFD_2_0)
> > > > - priv->can.ctrlmode_supported |= CAN_CTRLMODE_FD;
> > > > + priv->can.ctrlmode_supported |= CAN_CTRLMODE_FD |
> > > > +
> > > > + CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_AUTO;
> > > >
> > > > priv->reg_base = addr;
> > > > priv->tx_max = tx_max;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists