[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220530124315.31dc3742@p-imbrenda>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 12:43:15 +0200
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
scgl@...ux.ibm.com, mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/19] KVM: s390: pv: cleanup leftover protected VMs
if needed
On Mon, 30 May 2022 10:11:37 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 10:03 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> > index bd850be08c86..b20f2cbd43d9 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,19 @@
> [...]
> > +/**
> > + * @struct deferred_priv
> > + * Represents a "leftover" protected VM that is still registered
> > with the
> > + * Ultravisor, but which does not correspond any longer to an active
> > KVM VM.
> > + */
> > +struct deferred_priv {
>
> Why not just name this leftover_vm?
because I did not think of it :)
will fix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists