lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 May 2022 12:43:15 +0200
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
        thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        scgl@...ux.ibm.com, mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/19] KVM: s390: pv: cleanup leftover protected VMs
 if needed

On Mon, 30 May 2022 10:11:37 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 10:03 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> > index bd850be08c86..b20f2cbd43d9 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,19 @@  
> [...]
> > +/**
> > + * @struct deferred_priv
> > + * Represents a "leftover" protected VM that is still registered
> > with the
> > + * Ultravisor, but which does not correspond any longer to an active
> > KVM VM.
> > + */
> > +struct deferred_priv {  
> 
> Why not just name this leftover_vm?

because I did not think of it :)

will fix

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ